On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 15:45 +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7 April 2014 03:41, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 00:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> 3.2.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > [...]
> > --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> > +++
Hi,
On 7 April 2014 03:41, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 00:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> 3.2.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> [...]
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
[...]
> + /*
> +* i + 1 now
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 00:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
[...]
Raphael Geissert previously prepared a backport of this for Debian,
which I overlooked while trying to handle it for 3.2-stable. When
comparing the two, I fo
3.2.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jeff Layton
commit 5d81de8e8667da7135d3a32a964087c0faf5483f upstream.
It's possible for userland to pass down an iovec via writev() that has a
bogus user pointer in it. If that happens and we'r
