On Wednesday 26 February 2014 15:28:35 Shawn Guo wrote:
>
> The error is only seen on the linux-next, and partially caused by the
> resolution for the conflict between this patch and the ones I queued for
> 3.15. I'm rebasing my imx-soc-3.15 branch to 3.14-rc4, so that the
> conflict can be solve
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:46:03PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 February 2014, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > When building a kernel image with only CONFIG_CPU_IDLE but no CONFIG_PM,
> > we will get the following link error.
> >
>
> I seem to need more changes on top of this, to allow buildi
On Tuesday 18 February 2014, Shawn Guo wrote:
> When building a kernel image with only CONFIG_CPU_IDLE but no CONFIG_PM,
> we will get the following link error.
>
I seem to need more changes on top of this, to allow building with neither
CPU_IDLE nor PM enabled. Can you verify that?
Arnd
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:35:05AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> When building a kernel image with only CONFIG_CPU_IDLE but no CONFIG_PM,
> we will get the following link error.
>
> LD init/built-in.o
> arch/arm/mach-imx/built-in.o: In function `imx6q_enter_wait':
> platform-spi_imx.c:(.text+0x
When building a kernel image with only CONFIG_CPU_IDLE but no CONFIG_PM,
we will get the following link error.
LD init/built-in.o
arch/arm/mach-imx/built-in.o: In function `imx6q_enter_wait':
platform-spi_imx.c:(.text+0x25c0): undefined reference to `imx6q_set_lpm'
platform-spi_imx.c:(.text
