Re: [Xen-devel] xen-netback stable backports request (regression fixes)

2013-05-31 Thread William Dauchy
Thanks Ian, On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > The following set of patches fix a xen netback regression caused by the > fixes for CVE-2013-0216 / CVE-2013-0217 / XSA-39 (the original change > was several patches starting at 48856286b64e), we'd like to see them > backported t

Re: [Xen-devel] xen-netback stable backports request (regression fixes)

2013-05-31 Thread William Dauchy
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:20 PM, William Dauchy wrote: > I applied the patches on a 3.4.x kernel. > for netback I had to include: > 9eaee8b xen-netback: fix sparse warning > which I guess is ok to include in 3.4 > > for netfront, as Luis said, I also add to include: > f36c374 xen/netfront: handle

Re: [Xen-devel] xen-netback stable backports request (regression fixes)

2013-06-03 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 15:45 +0200, William Dauchy wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:20 PM, William Dauchy wrote: > > I applied the patches on a 3.4.x kernel. > > for netback I had to include: > > 9eaee8b xen-netback: fix sparse warning > > which I guess is ok to include in 3.4 > > > > for netfron

Re: [Xen-devel] xen-netback stable backports request (regression fixes)

2013-06-05 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 14:08 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:52:59PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > The module parameter was introduce after 3.9 and then renamed before > > v3.10-rc1 happened, the original name was never part of an -rc let alone > > an actual release. > > Ah, ok,