The patch below does not apply to the 3.13-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to .
thanks,
greg k-h
-- original commit in Linus's tree --
>
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 3.13-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to .
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:59:27PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> >
> > The patch below does not apply to the 3.13-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport,
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:59:27PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > >
> > > The patch below does not apply to the 3.13-stable tree.
> > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or long
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:40:20PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:59:27PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The patch below does not apply to the 3.13-stable tree.
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Luis Henriques wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:40:20PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > But the version for 3.10.34 (or perhaps now 3.10.35) is this below.
> > Yes, more differences, and the old mem_cgroup_reparent_charges line
> > is intentionally left in for 3.10 where
On Fri 21-03-14 11:23:51, Luís Henriques wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:40:20PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
[...]
> > But the version for 3.10.34 (or perhaps now 3.10.35) is this below.
> > Yes, more differences, and the old mem_cgroup_reparent_charges line
> > is intentionally left in for 3.10
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:05:07AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:40:20PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > >
> > > But the version for 3.10.34 (or perhaps now 3.10.35) is this below.
> > > Yes, more differences, and the old mem_
On Fri 21-03-14 12:54:03, Luís Henriques wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:05:07AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:40:20PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But the version for 3.10.34 (or perhaps now 3.10.35) is
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:40:20PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:59:27PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The patch below does not apply to the 3.13-stable tree.
On 03/21/2014 12:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:59:27PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>>>
>>> The patch below does not apply to the 3.13-stable tree.
>>> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
11 matches
Mail list logo