Re: [Standards] private storage revisited

2007-07-08 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Joe Hildebrand wrote: > Sigh. One of the goals of PEP was that it was supposed to be easy to > implement on the clioent side. True. Unfortunately, one of the features of the XSF standards process is that it's based on consensus, with Council approval for changes to Draft standards. In this case, t

Re: [Standards] private storage revisited

2007-07-08 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Mridul Muralidharan wrote: > Whether to autocreate or to return error saying node does not exist > (item-not-found) - can this be an implementation detail ? That is, are > clients expected to handle the error path too and explictly create ? > We do not have auto create in pubsub iirc (not sure if

Re: [Standards] private storage revisited

2007-07-08 Thread Joe Hildebrand
Sigh. One of the goals of PEP was that it was supposed to be easy to implement on the clioent side. On 7/8/07, Mridul Muralidharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ian Paterson wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> So we'd have something like this: >> >> >> >> >> >> >>

Re: [Standards] private storage revisited

2007-07-08 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Ian Paterson wrote: Peter Saint-Andre wrote: So we'd have something like this: My nurse's birthday! http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#node_config