Re: [Standards] Nodeprep question

Mickaël Rémond wrote: > Hello, > > Le 19 nov. 07 à 23:20, Tomasz Sterna a écrit : > >> Dnia 19-11-2007, Pn o godzinie 22:27 +0100, Mickaël Rémond pisze: >>> Nodeprep adds forbidden characters to usual stringprep tables. Among >>> those characters we find "/" (47). >> >> IIUC the only reason that

Re: [Standards] XEP-0166: references to XEP-0155 and XEP-0168

Lauri Kaila wrote: > 2007/12/1, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> (1) XEP-0155 and XEP-0168 are not normative dependencies in XEP-0166, >> and we mention them only to help implementors. However, I think it would >> be best to move those references to XEP-0208. I am also open to delaying >>

[Standards] XEP-0166 v. 0.22pre1

OK, I think that I have incorporated the Last Call feedback received so far. Please let me know if I have missed anything. Rendered document: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0166-0.22.html SVN diff: http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0166.xml?r1=1420&r2=1440 Pete

Re: [Standards] Relaxing XEP-0084 regarding multiple elements

Jesus Cea wrote: > If I can ask... > > "" demands height/width... What if the avatar is a SVG file?. Incorrect. It is RECOMMENDED, not REQUIRED: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0084.html#table-1 See also the schema: ==>type='xs:

Re: [Standards] s2s blocking of abusive users

On Wt, 2007-12-04 at 16:27 +0100, Jesus Cea wrote: > All traffic between two xmpp servers is transmitted using a single TCP > connection. You can't "delay" a single remote user. You "delay" all of them. I am very aware of that. > In fact, if I would program a xmpp server, I would enqueue in RAM

Re: [Standards] Relaxing XEP-0084 regarding multiple elements

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: >> "" demands height/width... What if the avatar is a SVG file?. > > Then it says how large it should be rendered? Ah. That is a point :-). Then I don't understand why each "" includes a height/width if all "" are "equiv

Re: [Standards] s2s blocking of abusive users

Jesus Cea wrote: > I think stpeter is talking more in the line of "I'm receiving abusing > traffic from [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't want to punish ALL @ users. I > rather > prefer to send a control stanza to @ server asking for banning > [EMAIL PROTECTED] traffic to me, giving a reason". Th

Re: [Standards] Relaxing XEP-0084 regarding multiple elements

Hello On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 04:44:28PM +0100, Jesus Cea wrote: > If I can ask... > > "" demands height/width... What if the avatar is a SVG file?. Then it says how large it should be rendered? -- Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of HDDs. Michal 'vorner' Vaner pgpN

Re: [Standards] Relaxing XEP-0084 regarding multiple elements

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If I can ask... "" demands height/width... What if the avatar is a SVG file?. - -- Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.argo.es/~jcea/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ jabber / xmpp:[EMAI

Re: [Standards] s2s blocking of abusive users

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tomasz Sterna wrote: > Dnia 28-11-2007, Śr o godzinie 01:05 +0100, Jesus Cea pisze: >>> The TCP buffering, timeouts and retransmission will handle the rest, >>> thus you will effectively enforce the peer to transmit no faster >> than >>> 10kbps. >> The

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: XMPP Transport Layer Security

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Karneges wrote: > Most TLS libraries operate as a "black box", passing an opaque stream of > bytes > to the application. I'd suggest making the XEP have a more transparent use > of TLS to match this fact. In other words, rather than saying