On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we should change the title to Web Services over XMPP? :)
definetely
However, I suppose that when most people think of web services they
think of SOAP and the whole WS-* stack...
So let's teach them how to
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Johannes Wagener
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While thinking about the session I realized that it is possible to do this
behaviour like put/delete/... with the io data container. For example it
should be possible to write schemata for io of io data container that
On Sat Apr 5 04:50:12 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Who is we? Do you have multiple implementations in different
codebases? One of the major concerns I have heard with XML dsig is
interoperability (e.g., I have heard reports about serious interop
problems with SAML). In particular, I have
On Wed Apr 2 16:53:27 2008, Boyd Fletcher wrote:
Over the last couple of years we have discussed various approaches
to add
digital signature support to XMPP that did not violate the XML
nature of
XMPP like RFC3923. We would like to propose a method of using W3C¹s
XML
Digital Signature
Hi,
I had to learn these days that the presence server that comes with
the Cisco Unified Communications Manager uses SIMPLE and not XMPP
like I had hoped.
Googeling for a comparison leads to
http://www.jabber.org/protocol/xmpp-simple.shtml
Looks like this page does not exist anymore :(
Does
Ralph J.Mayer schrieb:
I had to learn these days that the presence server that comes with
the Cisco Unified Communications Manager uses SIMPLE and not XMPP
like I had hoped.
:(
Googeling for a comparison leads to
http://www.jabber.org/protocol/xmpp-simple.shtml
Looks like this page does not
