On Tuesday 10 June 2008 14:36:24 Rachel Blackman wrote:
> > On 06/10/2008 2:51 PM, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
> >> Dnia 2008-06-09, pon o godzinie 22:32 -0500, XMPP Extensions Editor
> >>
> >> pisze:
> >>> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
> >>>
> >>> Title: The /me Comman
FYI.
Original Message
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:10:16 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: XMPP Council <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Council] meeting agenda, 2008-06-18
We are scheduled to hold the next XMPP Council meeting a week from
today, on Wednesday, June
On 06/11/2008 11:54 AM, Justin Karneges wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 June 2008 07:09:24 Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 06/11/2008 6:53 AM, Fabio Forno wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
Yes, the idea behind XEP-0234 is that IBB will be the
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 07:09:24 Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 06/11/2008 6:53 AM, Fabio Forno wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> Yes, the idea behind XEP-0234 is that IBB will be the file transfer
> >> method of last resort, but that i
On 06/11/2008 9:13 AM, Remko Tronçon wrote:
>> So the server would determine if you are close to hitting some rate or
>> bandwidth limit and will tell you to slow down? What if the bottleneck
>> is between the recipient's server and the recipient's client (e.g., I am
>> on a fat pipe and you are on
The composition model is not yet well specified in XEP-0222 and
XEP-0223. By "composition" I mean how a receiving entity should
construct a full set of items, if desired. For example, if you publish
your bookmarks to a node whose NodeID is "storage:bookmarks" then I
assume that each published item
> So the server would determine if you are close to hitting some rate or
> bandwidth limit and will tell you to slow down? What if the bottleneck
> is between the recipient's server and the recipient's client (e.g., I am
> on a fat pipe and you are on a mobile connection)? Then perhaps it is
> the
On 06/11/2008 6:53 AM, Fabio Forno wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, the idea behind XEP-0234 is that IBB will be the file transfer
>> method of last resort, but that it will always work (for some value of
>> "always").
>
> Some sort of
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, the idea behind XEP-0234 is that IBB will be the file transfer
> method of last resort, but that it will always work (for some value of
> "always").
Some sort of "always", correct. The worst case scenario with
> I suppose it could also be possible to use a callback set to fire off by
> a timer in the case stanzas, to prevent it from flooding the
> server. That was my main thoughts, to avoid penalty from the server.
The problem is that this timer is very dependent on network situation,
type of server, t
> +1 Historical XEP
I second that.
Remko
11 matches
Mail list logo
