Re: [Standards] Reg MUC Roomname

Hi, Thank u very much for the reply. One more query, whether the id attribute in xmpp stanzas is case sensitive or not. Please clarify my doubt. Regards Thanik On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: Hello On Mon, Jun 30,

Re: [Standards] Reg MUC Roomname

Hello On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 12:03:33PM +0530, Thanik wrote: One more query, whether the id attribute in xmpp stanzas is case sensitive or not. You do not need to distinguish, you get it back as is and it depends on you, what IDs you generate. Have a nice day -- This is a terroristic

Re: [Standards] XEP-0115: invalid example + node in disco results

Pedro Melo wrote: On Jul 1, 2008, at 11:18 PM, Tobias Markmann wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tobias Markmann wrote: Hi, First of all kostix from tkabber found an invalid example in XEP-0115 under

Re: [Standards] Collection Oversights in XEP-0060

At http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2008-June/019234.html (sorry, I lost the original message) Nathan Fritz wrote: Examples 216 and 219, the notification of disassociation/association are neither a followup of the example that they show, nor does the collection have a node