Dave Cridland wrote:
On Tue Jul 29 06:49:41 2008, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In accordance with XMPP Council consensus, I have provisionally
separated
all the information about pubsub collections into a new spec:
I wonder
Hi. Have one question here.
Is there a way to query the xmpp server to know the total users currently
online. Is it define in one of the xep ?
Sylvaincat_side_en.gif
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Sylvain Mundialco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. Have one question here.
Is there a way to query the xmpp server to know the total users currently
online. Is it define in one of the xep ?
Sylvain
Hi,
There is a deprecated Statistics Gathering XEP,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Sylvain Mundialco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to query the xmpp server to know the total users currently
online. Is it define in one of the xep ?
Yes:
XEP-0039: Statistics Gathering
http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0039.html
On Jul 29, 2008, at 14:11, Sylvain Mundialco wrote:
Hi. Have one question here.
Is there a way to query the xmpp server to know the total users
currently online. Is it define in one of the xep ?
Hi,
ejabberd uses Ad-Hoc commands for this, returning a form with the
requested information.
Andreas Monitzer wrote:
On Jul 29, 2008, at 14:11, Sylvain Mundialco wrote:
Hi. Have one question here.
Is there a way to query the xmpp server to know the total users
currently online. Is it define in one of the xep ?
Hi,
ejabberd uses Ad-Hoc commands for this, returning a form with the
Ralph Meijer wrote:
Dave Cridland wrote:
On Tue Jul 29 06:49:41 2008, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In accordance with XMPP Council consensus, I have provisionally
separated
all the information about pubsub collections into a
Dirk Meyer wrote:
Sorry for the late answer, I've been very busy the last weeks.
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Dirk Meyer wrote:
The same is true for presence (in RFC 39210. I found the presence
handling much too complicate to implement. It took me longer than
adding PubSub and XTLS support.
Yes,
Hi Jack,
Jack Moffitt wrote:
It is quite easy to extend MUC. One way is through plugins in your
muc implementation. For example, Chesspark creates a new role in our
game MUCs called player. Players don't normally receive messages to
the room from non-players. This is so that people
On Tue Jul 29 15:18:01 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Ralph Meijer wrote:
Dave Cridland wrote:
On Tue Jul 29 06:49:41 2008, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In accordance with XMPP Council consensus, I have
provisionally
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:21:02 -0600
Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahoj Pavle! ;-)
Pavel Simerda wrote:
Hello,
I finally got to examine the XEP-0154 (User Profile).
Thanks for the review.
It was fun :).
When reading
through I realized how big a job it was to
1. message stanzas to the bare JID should not be send to this client
because no user will read it. Use message storage or whatever a
server may do with such a message.
Agreed, and this required by RFC 3921. (Section 11.1 Rule 4.1).
2. message stanzas to the full JID should be send to
Arne König wrote:
Hi Jack,
Jack Moffitt wrote:
It is quite easy to extend MUC. One way is through plugins in your
muc implementation. For example, Chesspark creates a new role in our
game MUCs called player. Players don't normally receive messages to
the room from non-players. This is so
Ahoj Pavle!
Pavel Simerda wrote:
Hello,
I have some suggestions for XEP-0231 (Data Element).
Thanks for looking at this spec so thoroughly.
Right now, as the example shows:
message from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/castle'
to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
type='groupchat'
bodyYet here's a
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:49:01 -0600
Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahoj Pavle!
Pavel Simerda wrote:
Hello,
I have some suggestions for XEP-0231 (Data Element).
Thanks for looking at this spec so thoroughly.
I actually have some questions. First, lolek from the jabbim.cz
Jack Moffitt wrote:
1. message stanzas to the bare JID should not be send to this client
because no user will read it. Use message storage or whatever a
server may do with such a message.
Agreed, and this required by RFC 3921. (Section 11.1 Rule 4.1).
2. message stanzas to the full JID
16 matches
Mail list logo
