Re: [Standards] XEP-0198 suggestion (Stream management)

2009-03-07 Thread Dave Cridland
On Sat Mar 7 00:49:30 2009, Joe Hildebrand wrote: I actually think that moving stream management after the bind is a good thing. Much more flexible, and a relatively minor change. I think moving sm-id generation - which is the real issue - until after resumable sessions are enabled, and

Re: [Standards] XEP-0198 suggestion (Stream management)

2009-03-07 Thread Philipp Hancke
Dave Cridland wrote: On Fri Mar 6 06:39:19 2009, Curtis King wrote: The xep needs some filling out or maybe be split into two separate xeps. IMHO, resuming a session is only useful for C2S connections. Why bother with S2S connections. Resuming S2S sessions is mostly concerned with

Re: [Standards] XEP-0198 suggestion (Stream management)

2009-03-07 Thread Joe Hildebrand
On Mar 7, 2009, at 2:07 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: On Sat Mar 7 00:49:30 2009, Joe Hildebrand wrote: I actually think that moving stream management after the bind is a good thing. Much more flexible, and a relatively minor change. I think moving sm-id generation - which is the real issue -