Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0258 (Security Labels in XMPP)

2009-03-11 Thread Kurt Zeilenga
On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Boyd Fletcher wrote: I think it should be generalized further so not be specific to either ESS or ICISM. As nothing in the specification calls for use any particular label format in XMPP. In fact, the first and second implementations of this specification

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0258 (Security Labels in XMPP)

2009-03-11 Thread Boyd Fletcher
On 3/11/09 12:16 PM, Kurt Zeilenga kurt.zeile...@isode.com wrote: On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Boyd Fletcher wrote: I think it should be generalized further so not be specific to either ESS or ICISM. As nothing in the specification calls for use any particular label format in

[Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0166 (Jingle)

2009-03-11 Thread XMPP Extensions Editor
Version 0.36 of XEP-0166 (Jingle) has been released. Abstract: This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension for initiating and managing peer-to-peer media sessions between two XMPP entities in a way that is interoperable with existing Internet standards. The protocol provides a

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0258 (Security Labels in XMPP)

2009-03-11 Thread Dave Cridland
On Wed Mar 11 16:49:05 2009, Boyd Fletcher wrote: On 3/11/09 12:16 PM, Kurt Zeilenga kurt.zeile...@isode.com wrote: On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Boyd Fletcher wrote: Though I am not a GUI guy, I do recall discussion in HTML land that not all hexadecimal values are display safe, however

Re: [Standards] XEP-0045 Muc invite

2009-03-11 Thread Alexander Gnauck
Peter Saint-Andre wrote: That's wrong. Will fix. http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0045.xml?r1=2830r2=2869 Thanks Alex

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0258 (Security Labels in XMPP)

2009-03-11 Thread Kurt Zeilenga
On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: On Wed Mar 11 16:49:05 2009, Boyd Fletcher wrote: On 3/11/09 12:16 PM, Kurt Zeilenga kurt.zeile...@isode.com wrote: On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Boyd Fletcher wrote: Though I am not a GUI guy, I do recall discussion in HTML land that not