On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Wed Mar 11 16:49:05 2009, Boyd Fletcher wrote:
On 3/11/09 12:16 PM, "Kurt Zeilenga" wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Boyd Fletcher wrote:
> Though I am not a GUI guy, I do recall discussion in HTML land that
> not all hexadecimal valu
Version 0.28 of XEP-0167 (Jingle RTP Sessions) has been released.
Abstract: This specification defines a Jingle application type for negotiating
one or more sessions that use the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) to
exchange media such as voice or video. The application type includes a
straigh
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
That's wrong. Will fix.
http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0045.xml?r1=2830&r2=2869
Thanks
Alex
On Wed Mar 11 16:49:05 2009, Boyd Fletcher wrote:
On 3/11/09 12:16 PM, "Kurt Zeilenga"
wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Boyd Fletcher wrote:
> Though I am not a GUI guy, I do recall discussion in HTML land
that
> not all hexadecimal values are display safe, however this may now
be
>
Version 0.36 of XEP-0166 (Jingle) has been released.
Abstract: This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension for initiating
and managing peer-to-peer media sessions between two XMPP entities in a way
that is interoperable with existing Internet standards. The protocol provides a
pluggab
On 3/11/09 12:16 PM, "Kurt Zeilenga" wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Boyd Fletcher wrote:
>
>> >
>> > I think it should be generalized further so not be specific to
>> > either ESS or ICISM.
>
> As nothing in the specification calls for use any particular label
> format in XMPP.
On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Boyd Fletcher wrote:
I think it should be generalized further so not be specific to
either ESS or ICISM.
As nothing in the specification calls for use any particular label
format in XMPP. In fact, the first and second implementations of this
specification
