Andreas Monitzer wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 13:09, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>
>> Yes, maybe restrict the usage to a stanza and not allow it inside a
>> stanza by default. So a client MAY send any return from any XEP out of
>> band, but only the whole result. If out of band is allowed somewehere
>> deep
Version 1.2 of XEP-0047 (In-Band Bytestreams) has been released.
Abstract: This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension that enables
any two entities to establish a one-to-one bytestream between themselves, where
the data is broken down into smaller chunks and transported in-band over X
On 3/17/09 10:10 AM, Michael Grigutsch wrote:
> Hi!
Hi MiGri!
> In 2006 Peter Saint-Andre wrote a Draft for a JEP which would fill an
> important gap: It is about forwarding stanzas.
> You can find the document at
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/forwarding-delivery.html
There was some controv
Hi!
In 2006 Peter Saint-Andre wrote a Draft for a JEP which would fill an
important gap: It is about forwarding stanzas.
You can find the document at
http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/forwarding-delivery.html
I would love to see the XSF publish this as an official XEP and I volunteer
to hel
XMPP Extensions Editor schrieb:
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: Server IP Check
When IPv4 connections are accepted on IPv6 sockets, the application
typically sees a mapped IPv4 address, i.e. 192.0.2.100 gets mapped to
:::192.0.2.100.
Maybe the spe
