[Standards] A few errors in the schema of XEP-0166

2009-03-18 Thread Håvard Sørbø
Hi, there are a few errors in the jingle-schema of XEP-0166. http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0166.html A typo "maxOcccurs", should be replaced with "maxOccurs". Some none-closed tags should be replace with Also, the code generator I'm using gets very angry with: It's warning: T

[Standards] [Fwd: [Council] meeting minutes, 2009-03-18]

2009-03-18 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
FYI. Original Message Subject: [Council] meeting minutes, 2009-03-18 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:45:33 -0600 From: Peter Saint-Andre Reply-To: XMPP Council To: XMPP Council Results of the XMPP Council meeting held 2009-03-18... Agenda: http://xmpp.org/council/agendas/2009-03-

Re: [Standards] User Profile/Relationship/Project/Resume (was: MUC avatar/logo)

2009-03-18 Thread Nicolas Vérité
2009/3/18 Remko Tronçon : >> I think a VCard is exactly what you mean, or what do you mean by User >> Profile? > > He means XEP-154, but that one is dying anyway. [Yes, I meant that, answered offlist not to pollute] OK, I learn that XEP-0154 is being abandoned, so what about cutting and restrctu

Re: [Standards] roster partial activation & privacy lists

2009-03-18 Thread Fabio Forno
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Fabio Forno wrote: > all the people you want to see whether they are only or not they are online or not (there many more typos, but without this correction the sentence is almost all unreadable ;)) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber

[Standards] roster partial activation & privacy lists

2009-03-18 Thread Fabio Forno
A quick recap about all the discussions we had since Brussels and some new thoughts on roster optimizations - Roster sequencing rocks, it should be inserted into rfc3921bis and all the world will implement it - Partial roster retrieval: it's not clear whether it should be just retrieval or somet

Re: [Standards] MUC avatar/logo

2009-03-18 Thread Remko Tronçon
> I think a VCard is exactly what you mean, or what do you mean by User > Profile? He means XEP-154, but that one is dying anyway. cheers, Remko

Re: [Standards] MUC avatar/logo

2009-03-18 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 18.03.2009 um 14:43 schrieb Nicolas Vérité: Or "MUC Profile"? Like "User Profile"? I think a VCard is exactly what you mean, or what do you mean by User Profile? -- Jonathan PGP.sig Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht

Re: [Standards] MUC avatar/logo

2009-03-18 Thread Nicolas Vérité
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > Am 18.03.2009 um 13:20 schrieb Dave Cridland: > >> Options include: >> >> 1) An extended Disco feature of a URI to the room's logo. >> >> 2) An extended Disco feature of the room's logo (base64 encoded or >> something). >> >> 3) Define a

Re: [Standards] MUC avatar/logo

2009-03-18 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 18.03.2009 um 13:20 schrieb Dave Cridland: Options include: 1) An extended Disco feature of a URI to the room's logo. 2) An extended Disco feature of the room's logo (base64 encoded or something). 3) Define a pubsub root node for rooms, and PEP-for-MUC (MEP, as has been suggested). Th

Re: [Standards] MUC avatar/logo

2009-03-18 Thread Dave Cridland
On Wed Mar 18 12:14:51 2009, Nicolas Vérité wrote: Is it possible/easy/XEPable to have an image/avatar/logo that symbolizes a MUC? Just a funny wannabe gadget... though no doubt a killer-feature for some. I would have thought so, and I don't see the harm - in fact, I think it's a reasona

[Standards] MUC avatar/logo

2009-03-18 Thread Nicolas Vérité
Hi, I was just wondering... Is it possible/easy/XEPable to have an image/avatar/logo that symbolizes a MUC? Just a funny wannabe gadget... though no doubt a killer-feature for some. Nÿco -- Nicolas Vérité (Nÿco) mailto:nicolas.ver...@gmail.com Jabber ID : xmpp:n...@jabber.fr http://linuxfr.org

Re: [Standards] Anonymous users in Muc

2009-03-18 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 3/18/09 3:39 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote: >> I think we need a way to discover if a user is anonymous or not. >> Or require the server to add some extra stamped info to the presence >> of anonymous users. > > disco? http://xmpp.org/registrar/disco-categories.html#account That's the intent. I don

Re: [Standards] Anonymous users in Muc

2009-03-18 Thread Alexander Gnauck
Philipp Hancke wrote: Your server allows anonymous users to send messages to remote domains? yes it does, and many others do. This is the default in ejabberd when you enable anonymous logins. No idea if you can disable s2s for anonymous users. Regards, Alex -- Alexander Gnauck http://www.ag

Re: [Standards] Anonymous users in Muc

2009-03-18 Thread Kevin Smith
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: > That sounds entirely sane to me. Sorry, I quoted the wrong bit, try: > Eg in Muc it makes no sense to ban anonymous Jids or perform other similar > actions on such users. > Or a room owner may no allow anonymous users because of security rea

Re: [Standards] Anonymous users in Muc

2009-03-18 Thread Philipp Hancke
moin alex, with Speeqe, MatriX and other projects anonymous server logins get very popular. Do we have any extensions to detect anonymous users? I don't think so. Eg in Muc it makes no sense to ban anonymous Jids or perform other similar actions on such users. Or a room owner may no allow an

Re: [Standards] Anonymous users in Muc

2009-03-18 Thread Kevin Smith
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Alexander Gnauck wrote: > I think we need a way to discover if a user is anonymous or not. > Or require the server to add some extra stamped info to the presence of > anonymous users. That sounds entirely sane to me. /K

[Standards] Anonymous users in Muc

2009-03-18 Thread Alexander Gnauck
Hello, with Speeqe, MatriX and other projects anonymous server logins get very popular. Do we have any extensions to detect anonymous users? I don't think so. Eg in Muc it makes no sense to ban anonymous Jids or perform other similar actions on such users. Or a room owner may no allow anonym