Hi, there are a few errors in the jingle-schema of XEP-0166.
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0166.html
A typo "maxOcccurs", should be replaced with "maxOccurs".
Some none-closed tags
should be
replace
with
Also, the code generator I'm using gets very angry with:
It's warning:
T
FYI.
Original Message
Subject: [Council] meeting minutes, 2009-03-18
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:45:33 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre
Reply-To: XMPP Council
To: XMPP Council
Results of the XMPP Council meeting held 2009-03-18...
Agenda:
http://xmpp.org/council/agendas/2009-03-
2009/3/18 Remko Tronçon :
>> I think a VCard is exactly what you mean, or what do you mean by User
>> Profile?
>
> He means XEP-154, but that one is dying anyway.
[Yes, I meant that, answered offlist not to pollute]
OK, I learn that XEP-0154 is being abandoned, so what about cutting
and restrctu
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Fabio Forno wrote:
> all the people you want to see whether they are only or not
they are online or not (there many more typos, but without this
correction the sentence is almost all unreadable ;))
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber
A quick recap about all the discussions we had since Brussels and some
new thoughts on roster optimizations
- Roster sequencing rocks, it should be inserted into rfc3921bis and
all the world will implement it
- Partial roster retrieval: it's not clear whether it should be just
retrieval or somet
> I think a VCard is exactly what you mean, or what do you mean by User
> Profile?
He means XEP-154, but that one is dying anyway.
cheers,
Remko
Am 18.03.2009 um 14:43 schrieb Nicolas Vérité:
Or "MUC Profile"? Like "User Profile"?
I think a VCard is exactly what you mean, or what do you mean by User
Profile?
--
Jonathan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Jonathan Schleifer
wrote:
> Am 18.03.2009 um 13:20 schrieb Dave Cridland:
>
>> Options include:
>>
>> 1) An extended Disco feature of a URI to the room's logo.
>>
>> 2) An extended Disco feature of the room's logo (base64 encoded or
>> something).
>>
>> 3) Define a
Am 18.03.2009 um 13:20 schrieb Dave Cridland:
Options include:
1) An extended Disco feature of a URI to the room's logo.
2) An extended Disco feature of the room's logo (base64 encoded or
something).
3) Define a pubsub root node for rooms, and PEP-for-MUC (MEP, as has
been suggested). Th
On Wed Mar 18 12:14:51 2009, Nicolas Vérité wrote:
Is it possible/easy/XEPable to have an image/avatar/logo that
symbolizes a MUC?
Just a funny wannabe gadget... though no doubt a killer-feature for
some.
I would have thought so, and I don't see the harm - in fact, I think
it's a reasona
Hi,
I was just wondering...
Is it possible/easy/XEPable to have an image/avatar/logo that symbolizes a MUC?
Just a funny wannabe gadget... though no doubt a killer-feature for some.
Nÿco
--
Nicolas Vérité (Nÿco) mailto:nicolas.ver...@gmail.com
Jabber ID : xmpp:n...@jabber.fr
http://linuxfr.org
On 3/18/09 3:39 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
>> I think we need a way to discover if a user is anonymous or not.
>> Or require the server to add some extra stamped info to the presence
>> of anonymous users.
>
> disco? http://xmpp.org/registrar/disco-categories.html#account
That's the intent. I don
Philipp Hancke wrote:
Your server allows anonymous users to send messages to remote domains?
yes it does, and many others do. This is the default in ejabberd when
you enable anonymous logins. No idea if you can disable s2s for
anonymous users.
Regards,
Alex
--
Alexander Gnauck
http://www.ag
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> That sounds entirely sane to me.
Sorry, I quoted the wrong bit, try:
> Eg in Muc it makes no sense to ban anonymous Jids or perform other similar
> actions on such users.
> Or a room owner may no allow anonymous users because of security rea
moin alex,
with Speeqe, MatriX and other projects anonymous server logins get very
popular. Do we have any extensions to detect anonymous users? I don't
think so.
Eg in Muc it makes no sense to ban anonymous Jids or perform other
similar actions on such users. Or a room owner may no allow an
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Alexander Gnauck wrote:
> I think we need a way to discover if a user is anonymous or not.
> Or require the server to add some extra stamped info to the presence of
> anonymous users.
That sounds entirely sane to me.
/K
Hello,
with Speeqe, MatriX and other projects anonymous server logins get very
popular. Do we have any extensions to detect anonymous users? I don't
think so.
Eg in Muc it makes no sense to ban anonymous Jids or perform other
similar actions on such users. Or a room owner may no allow anonym
17 matches
Mail list logo