Dave Cridland schrieb:
That's an assertion not necessarily backed up by evidence. I am not
convinced that TLS + EXTERNAL is a non-starter on the public XMPP
network, but then again I help to run a CA that issues free domain
certificates for that network (visit http://xmpp.org/ca/ to get yours
Hi,
There are small typos in XEP-0050: Ad-Hoc Commands:
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0050.html
:%s/X-Windows/X-Window/g
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Window_System
;-)
--
Nicolas Vérité (Nÿco) mailto:nicolas.ver...@gmail.com
Jabber ID : xmpp:n...@jabber.fr
http://linuxfr.org/ -
On 4/16/09 8:03 AM, Nicolas Vérité wrote:
Hi,
There are small typos in XEP-0050: Ad-Hoc Commands:
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0050.html
:%s/X-Windows/X-Window/g
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Window_System
;-)
Fixed, thanks. :)
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
On 12/19/08 5:38 AM, Brett Zamir wrote:
Might the meta-data query result (section 5.4 in XEP-0060) recommend the
@type attribute on the x's field/ children so that a client could,
for example, know to display a boolean type as the more readable true
and false as opposed to the potential values
On 12/25/08 10:35 PM, Brett Zamir wrote:
Hi,
Along the lines of how Data Forms types and Data Forms Validation can
influence display of forms, I'd like to see some standard way in which
Pubsub payloads could be similarly extensible, not only by allowing
different namespaces (as is now
On 4/14/09 12:44 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote:
You are raising the scenario of the stream dying right after the server
sends 303. I'm saying that client 1 MUST NOT consider itself to be up to
date when it receives 303, because the server has already told it that
the latest version is 305.
2009/4/17 Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im:
I think you're making it too complicated for the typical usage.
Peter
Yeah. You are probably right. These are just nuances that would affect
very little people throughout the whole existence of the protocol, but
given they don't make anything
Ahoj Jirka,
On 4/16/09 8:39 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote:
2009/4/17 Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im:
I think you're making it too complicated for the typical usage.
Peter
Yeah. You are probably right. These are just nuances that would affect
very little people throughout the whole
2009/4/17 Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im:
Ahoj Jirka,
On 4/16/09 8:39 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote:
2009/4/17 Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im:
I think you're making it too complicated for the typical usage.
Peter
Yeah. You are probably right. These are just nuances that would
