-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/16/09 6:52 AM, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
>> 2009/5/16 Dirk Meyer :
>>> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sift.html
>>> I only took a quick look at the spec and maybe I missed it, but what
>>> happens to
Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
> 2009/5/16 Dirk Meyer :
>> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sift.html
>>
>> I only took a quick look at the spec and maybe I missed it, but what
>> happens to an IQ that got filtered? If a client sends an IQ it expects
>> an answer and that answer
2009/5/16 Dirk Meyer :
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sift.html
>
> I only took a quick look at the spec and maybe I missed it, but what
> happens to an IQ that got filtered? If a client sends an IQ it expects
> an answer and that answer maybe 'client not available'.
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sift.html
I only took a quick look at the spec and maybe I missed it, but what
happens to an IQ that got filtered? If a client sends an IQ it expects
an answer and that answer maybe 'client not available'. What is the
answer if the recipi
Hello. The filtering/intercepting functionality seems nice for IQ
stanzas, but I have doubts about some of the use cases.
"Invisibility" as defined by this spec would certainly ease it's
handling by both client and server, but is changes the meaning of
available and unavailable presence stanzas. T
