Re: [Standards] Idle sreams in RFCbis

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Mickael Remond < mickael.rem...@process-one.net> wrote: > Hello, > > Artur Hefczyc wrote: > > Only when you attempt to send some data, even a single character, the > > TCP/IP > > stack tries to deliver it to the destination address. Of course if the > > connection

Re: [Standards] Idle sreams in RFCbis

Hello, Artur Hefczyc wrote: > Only when you attempt to send some data, even a single character, the > TCP/IP > stack tries to deliver it to the destination address. Of course if the > connection > is broken, the attempt fails and an error is returned to sending > application. No, it is not correc

Re: [Standards] Idle sreams in RFCbis

2009/5/25 Artur Hefczyc : > Hi, > >> I would like to provide feedback on these two sections: >> >> 5.7.3.  Handling of Idle Streams >> >> http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis-09.html#streams-close-idle >> >> 12.7.  Whitespace >> >> http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-sainta

Re: [Standards] Idle sreams in RFCbis

Hi, I would like to provide feedback on these two sections: 5.7.3. Handling of Idle Streams http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis-09.html#streams-close-idle 12.7. Whitespace http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis-09.html#xml-whitespace In 5.7.3, i

Re: [Standards] Idle sreams in RFCbis

2009/5/25 Nicolas Vérité : > > Strictly speaking: > - the sending entity does not detect the loss of connection when it sends > whitespaces That's correct. > - the receiving entity detects the loss of connection only if it has a > mechanism that detects the absence of whitespaces Not really. It

[Standards] Idle sreams in RFCbis

Hi, I would like to provide feedback on these two sections: 5.7.3. Handling of Idle Streams http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis-09.html#streams-close-idle 12.7. Whitespace http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis-09.html#xml-whitespace In 5.7.3, it