Dave Cridland wrote:
[...]
In http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/muc/2010-February/000144.html you say
Another distinction between the two approaches is what the core aims
are - in PSA-style, it's to provide resilience between servers,
whereas in KD-style, it's largely to reduce redundant
Currently, per http://xmpp.org/registrar/disco-categories.html, 'irc' is
not a valid type for a gateway, only for a conference.
As best as I can tell, this minor distinction would seem to imply that
an IRC component can only proxy MUCs, but not 1:1 chats (except via a
room, but that breaks if I,
