Re: [Standards] use of XMPP protocols in HTML

2010-07-01 Thread Brett Zamir
Just to clarify a little, the specific advantage to XMPP would be that websites could offer the XMPP protocol by default, while allowing a fall-back to lead to either an explanatory HTTP page, or possibly, via the javascript: protocol, giving an alert or JavaScript-based message to indicate how

[Standards] use of XMPP protocols in HTML

2010-07-01 Thread Brett Zamir
Hi all, My Firefox extension, Open URIs, at https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/162154/ , has just been approved by the Mozilla review team. You can read the description there, but essentially, the aim of the add-on is to gain enough adoption and experience for the HTML5 working gr

Re: [Standards] SXE redux

2010-07-01 Thread Tom Pusateri
I'll read up on Wave and see how it compares. Tom On Jul 1, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 7/1/10 8:10 AM, Stephan Maka wrote: >> Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> Over the last few months I've been working with Tom Pusateri on some >>> updates to the Shared XML Editing spec, bas

Re: [Standards] SXE redux

2010-07-01 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 7/1/10 8:10 AM, Stephan Maka wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Over the last few months I've been working with Tom Pusateri on some >> updates to the Shared XML Editing spec, based on his implementation >> experience. As a result, we have updated the proposal: >> >> http://xmpp.org/extensions

Re: [Standards] SXE redux

2010-07-01 Thread Stephan Maka
Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Over the last few months I've been working with Tom Pusateri on some > updates to the Shared XML Editing spec, based on his implementation > experience. As a result, we have updated the proposal: > > http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sxe.html As a potential implementer I