On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> On 4/7/11 7:53 AM, "Kevin Smith" wrote:
>
>>> We also need to get the "only send me updates sense the last time I was
>>> online at time X (UTC)" extension increased in priority.
>>
>> Oh, right. For that, I think we just want pubsub nodes t
On 4/7/11 7:53 AM, "Kevin Smith" wrote:
>> We also need to get the "only send me updates sense the last time I was
>> online at time X (UTC)" extension increased in priority.
>
> Oh, right. For that, I think we just want pubsub nodes to expose MAM.
MAM? Please parse.
I was talking about:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> On 4/6/11 10:18 PM, "Kevin Smith" wrote:
>
>> I like the idea of knowing when vcards change. Retreiving at login
>> because the entire payload is in PEP would be horrid.
>
> We also need to get the "only send me updates sense the last time I
On 4/6/11 10:18 PM, "Kevin Smith" wrote:
> I like the idea of knowing when vcards change. Retreiving at login
> because the entire payload is in PEP would be horrid.
We also need to get the "only send me updates sense the last time I was
online at time X (UTC)" extension increased in priority.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> One approach might be to use IQs for vCard publication and retrieval,
> but a special PEP node for notifications that a vCard has changed (if
> anyone cares).
That was my suggestion, until I re-read your mail and realised you'd
already su
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Wed Apr 6 19:55:17 2011, Waqas Hussain wrote:
>>
>> Also, PEP in MUC is not a solved problem. I do like avatars in MUC.
>
> I'd note that in Belgium, the consensus seemed to be to solve that problem
> rather than continue to work around i
On Wed Apr 6 19:55:17 2011, Waqas Hussain wrote:
Also, PEP in MUC is not a solved problem. I do like avatars in MUC.
I'd note that in Belgium, the consensus seemed to be to solve that
problem rather than continue to work around it. Additionally, a
recall the consensus as being to deprecate
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> A few minutes ago I published an Internet-Draft that specifies a vCard
> KIND of "thing" (instead of "individual" etc.) for use by entities such
> as XMPP servers or MUC rooms. This made me think again about whether we
> want to use IQs (
A few minutes ago I published an Internet-Draft that specifies a vCard
KIND of "thing" (instead of "individual" etc.) for use by entities such
as XMPP servers or MUC rooms. This made me think again about whether we
want to use IQs (as in vcard-temp) or PEP (as currently in XEP-0292) as
the way to t
On 6 April 2011 14:54, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Matthew A. Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 6, 2011, at 07:48 , Kevin Smith wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Matthew A. Miller
>>> wrote:
>>
>> That's what I'm suggesting; Have "jid" be the full occupant
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Matthew A. Miller
wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2011, at 07:48 , Kevin Smith wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Matthew A. Miller
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 6, 2011, at 07:21 , Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>
On 4/5/11 9:59 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
> On 6 April
On Apr 6, 2011, at 07:48 , Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Matthew A. Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 6, 2011, at 07:21 , Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/5/11 9:59 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 6 April 2011 04:45, Brian Cully wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2011, at 23:24, Mat
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Matthew A. Miller
wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2011, at 07:21 , Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
>> On 4/5/11 9:59 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>> On 6 April 2011 04:45, Brian Cully wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 23:24, Matthew Wild wrote:
> The only downside to this is ba
On Apr 6, 2011, at 07:21 , Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 4/5/11 9:59 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>> On 6 April 2011 04:45, Brian Cully wrote:
>>> On Apr 5, 2011, at 23:24, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>>
The only downside to this is backwards-compatibility. I haven't tested
any, but it might ups
On 4/5/11 9:59 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
> On 6 April 2011 04:45, Brian Cully wrote:
>> On Apr 5, 2011, at 23:24, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>
>>> The only downside to this is backwards-compatibility. I haven't tested
>>> any, but it might upset some clients to see an with no 'jid'.
>>
>> Why can't the
15 matches
Mail list logo
