Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0267 (Server Buddies)

2011-12-10 Thread Kim Alvefur
Hi I had some thougts about using PEP in combination with this for sharing things like peer server certs seen, and incident reports. - Original message - Version 0.2 of XEP-0267 (Server Buddies) has been released. Abstract: This specification defines a convention for presence

Re: [Standards] Schemas in XEPs

2011-12-10 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi Bala, Here is my view: 1) the schema never expresses all constraints since it is not powerful enough to describe them. For simpler tasks it is not useful to describe all constraints in a schema since otherwise the schema becomes unreadable. 2) nobody! validates instance documents (in a

Re: [Standards] Schemas in XEPs

2011-12-10 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Peter, provide more details. And, explain what you mean by schema checking? Ciao Hannes On Dec 9, 2011, at 8:10 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: In addition, I know of at least one large deployment community that performs active schema-checking for XMPP traffic. Those folks would like it if

Re: [Standards] Schemas in XEPs

2011-12-10 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
If the content doesn't match the schema, they bounce the message with an error (or perhaps quarantine it somehow). These are military deployments in which they don't like to have rogue XML sent around. On 12/10/11 6:56 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: Peter, provide more details. And, explain