I've just been reading through the current version of
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0280.html and have a couple of
comments:
In example 14, we have:
message xmlns='jabber:client'
from='ro...@example.net'
to='ro...@example.net/home'
type='chat'
forwarded
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Kevin Smith ke...@kismith.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Matthew Wild mwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 December 2011 15:27, Matthew A. Miller linuxw...@outer-planes.net
wrote:
On Nov 1, 2011, at 15:36, Kim Alvefur wrote:
Hi!
I've noted that
On Wed Jan 4 11:12:56 2012, Kevin Smith wrote:
messagecarbonforwardmessage//forward/carbon/message
Isn't the forward/ providing no information at all, here? (Not that
it ever was).
Surely it's entirely and completely implied by the carbon/.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland -
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
On Wed Jan 4 11:12:56 2012, Kevin Smith wrote:
messagecarbonforwardmessage//forward/carbon/message
Isn't the forward/ providing no information at all, here? (Not that it
ever was).
Surely it's entirely and completely
On Wed Jan 4 11:24:50 2012, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net
wrote:
On Wed Jan 4 11:12:56 2012, Kevin Smith wrote:
messagecarbonforwardmessage//forward/carbon/message
Isn't the forward/ providing no information at all, here? (Not
that
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
On Wed Jan 4 11:24:50 2012, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
On Wed Jan 4 11:12:56 2012, Kevin Smith wrote:
messagecarbonforwardmessage//forward/carbon/message
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 11:24 +, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
On Wed Jan 4 11:12:56 2012, Kevin Smith wrote:
messagecarbonforwardmessage//forward/carbon/message
Isn't the forward/ providing no information at all, here? (Not
Dear all,
I found some typos in RFC6120 and XEP-220.
In RFC6120, I think that the word 'FDQN' should be 'FQDN'.
3. If a response is received, it will contain one or more
combinations of a port and FDQN, each of which is weighted and
prioritized as described in [DNS-SRV].
On Jan 4, 2012, at 05:46, Kim Alvefur wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 11:24 +, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
On Wed Jan 4 11:12:56 2012, Kevin Smith wrote:
messagecarbonforwardmessage//forward/carbon/message
Isn't the forward/
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Matthew Miller
linuxw...@outer-planes.net wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 05:46, Kim Alvefur wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 11:24 +, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
On Wed Jan 4 11:12:56 2012, Kevin Smith
On Wed Jan 4 14:22:30 2012, Kevin Smith wrote:
I think it'd be good to pick something and use it consistently,
whatever that thing is.
I'd like to paint it green.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:d...@cridland.net - xmpp:d...@dave.cridland.net
-
On Jan 4, 2012, at 07:25, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Wed Jan 4 14:22:30 2012, Kevin Smith wrote:
I think it'd be good to pick something and use it consistently,
whatever that thing is.
I'd like to paint it green.
Only if you know the Mayor of Boston.
- mm
http://goo.gl/LK55L
On Jan 4, 2012, at 03:57, Kevin Smith wrote:
I've just been reading through the current version of
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0280.html and have a couple of
comments:
In example 14, we have:
message xmlns='jabber:client'
from='ro...@example.net'
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Matthew Miller
linuxw...@outer-planes.net wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 07:25, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Wed Jan 4 14:22:30 2012, Kevin Smith wrote:
I think it'd be good to pick something and use it consistently,
whatever that thing is.
I'd like to paint it
Noted. Thanks for the bug reports!
On 1/4/12 6:18 AM, Nobuo Ogashiwa wrote:
Dear all,
I found some typos in RFC6120 and XEP-220.
In RFC6120, I think that the word 'FDQN' should be 'FQDN'.
3. If a response is received, it will contain one or more
combinations of a port and FDQN,
A few things to note about the upcoming XMPP Summit, happening at the
same time as FOSDEM 2012.
1) The XSF has a formal Work Team, open to any members, to lead the
self-organization of our FOSDEM 2012 experience. Members should feel
overwhelmingly encouraged to join, and help.
Mailing
16 matches
Mail list logo
