On 1/9/12 2:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I've updated the "Network Information Sharing" (and renamed it) to
> include a scenario about publishing such data, too:
>
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/network.html
I just pushed out version 0.0.3, adding an ad-hoc command for triggering
the pre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'd like to discuss the status of XEP 0075 with you.
My motivation to use it is to write an XMPP based application. It's a
distributed system with a web client for managing some entities.
There are several ways to communicate with application ser
On Jan 9, 2012, at 09:06, Wayne Franklin wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> Sorry to hear that you didn't see the advantages to our approach. We respect
> the decision of the council and will provide feedback to XEP-0289. Does this
> mean that the other DMUC specs are out of the running?
>
I personally
I've updated the "Network Information Sharing" (and renamed it) to
include a scenario about publishing such data, too:
http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/network.html
Continued feedback is welcome.
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
http://stpeter.im/
FYI regarding the upcoming meetings in Brussels. Please join the
sum...@xmpp.org list to discuss:
http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/summit
Original Message
Subject: [Summit] Brussels discussion topics
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:16:57 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre
Reply-To:
> -Original Message-
> From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On
> Behalf Of Dave Cridland
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:46 AM
> To: XMPP Standards
> Subject: Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub
>
> But it has other applications, as well - push notifications
> -Original Message-
> From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On
> Behalf Of Sergey Dobrov
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:29 AM
> To: standards@xmpp.org
> Subject: Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub
>
> On 01/06/2012 11:12 PM, Stephen Pendleton wrote:
> >
>
Hi,
On 9 January 2012 14:46, Dave Cridland wrote:
> But there's more than that, too - you'd want to get the microblog in total,
> rather than having to be online to keep track of it - that is, you don't
> want to miss any posts. So when your special microblog client comes online,
> you want to pi
On Mon Jan 9 13:28:48 2012, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
As I can understand, you just have a service which tracks other
users
locations. For such reason, current PEP is really suitable. But if
you
will try to track one's location by many users you will have a
problem
because you will need to do ma
On 01/06/2012 11:12 PM, Stephen Pendleton wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On
>> Behalf Of Sergey Dobrov
>> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 3:37 AM
>> To: standards@xmpp.org
>> Subject: Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub
>
On 01/07/2012 06:13 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Fri Jan 6 08:37:14 2012, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
>> It seems strange to me that working of few protocols that are not used
>> too widely (I don't know people who really use moods or activity since
>> it's not too usable) at situation that even these p
11 matches
Mail list logo