Re: [Standards] service directories

2012-01-09 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 1/9/12 2:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > I've updated the "Network Information Sharing" (and renamed it) to > include a scenario about publishing such data, too: > > http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/network.html I just pushed out version 0.0.3, adding an ad-hoc command for triggering the pre

[Standards] Status of XEP 0075

2012-01-09 Thread Markus Kohlhase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'd like to discuss the status of XEP 0075 with you. My motivation to use it is to write an XMPP based application. It's a distributed system with a web client for managing some entities. There are several ways to communicate with application ser

Re: [Standards] Council Decision on DMUC3 Proto-XEP

2012-01-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Jan 9, 2012, at 09:06, Wayne Franklin wrote: > Matthew, > > Sorry to hear that you didn't see the advantages to our approach. We respect > the decision of the council and will provide feedback to XEP-0289. Does this > mean that the other DMUC specs are out of the running? > I personally

[Standards] service directories

2012-01-09 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
I've updated the "Network Information Sharing" (and renamed it) to include a scenario about publishing such data, too: http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/network.html Continued feedback is welcome. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre http://stpeter.im/

[Standards] Fwd: [Summit] Brussels discussion topics

2012-01-09 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
FYI regarding the upcoming meetings in Brussels. Please join the sum...@xmpp.org list to discuss: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/summit Original Message Subject: [Summit] Brussels discussion topics Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:16:57 -0700 From: Peter Saint-Andre Reply-To:

Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub

2012-01-09 Thread Stephen Pendleton
> -Original Message- > From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On > Behalf Of Dave Cridland > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:46 AM > To: XMPP Standards > Subject: Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub > > But it has other applications, as well - push notifications

Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub

2012-01-09 Thread Stephen Pendleton
> -Original Message- > From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On > Behalf Of Sergey Dobrov > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:29 AM > To: standards@xmpp.org > Subject: Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub > > On 01/06/2012 11:12 PM, Stephen Pendleton wrote: > > >

Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub

2012-01-09 Thread Tuomas Koski
Hi, On 9 January 2012 14:46, Dave Cridland wrote: > But there's more than that, too - you'd want to get the microblog in total, > rather than having to be online to keep track of it - that is, you don't > want to miss any posts. So when your special microblog client comes online, > you want to pi

Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub

2012-01-09 Thread Dave Cridland
On Mon Jan 9 13:28:48 2012, Sergey Dobrov wrote: As I can understand, you just have a service which tracks other users locations. For such reason, current PEP is really suitable. But if you will try to track one's location by many users you will have a problem because you will need to do ma

Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub

2012-01-09 Thread Sergey Dobrov
On 01/06/2012 11:12 PM, Stephen Pendleton wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On >> Behalf Of Sergey Dobrov >> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 3:37 AM >> To: standards@xmpp.org >> Subject: Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub >

Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub

2012-01-09 Thread Sergey Dobrov
On 01/07/2012 06:13 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Fri Jan 6 08:37:14 2012, Sergey Dobrov wrote: >> It seems strange to me that working of few protocols that are not used >> too widely (I don't know people who really use moods or activity since >> it's not too usable) at situation that even these p