On 20 apr. 2012, at 10:32, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Matthew Wild mwi...@gmail.com wrote:
One solution I came up with was for an entity that relays and archives
messages to stamp the message with: archived by=capulet.lit
id=1234-5678/ or archived
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Thijs Alkemade th...@xnyhps.nl wrote:
On 20 apr. 2012, at 10:32, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Matthew Wild mwi...@gmail.com wrote:
One solution I came up with was for an entity that relays and archives
messages to stamp the message
On 5/23/12 1:28 AM, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
On 05/23/2012 03:24 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 5/22/12 12:40 PM, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
Well, the need to *change* it from the default to some reasonable value
implies that the default value is unreasonable. That might depend on
implementation and
