[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0308 (Last Message Correction)

2012-07-31 Thread XMPP Extensions Editor
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0308 (Last Message Correction). Abstract: This specification defines a method for marking a message as a correction of the last sent message. URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0308.html This Last Call begins today and shall

[Standards] Call for Experience: Advancement of XEP-0071 (XHTML-IM) to Final

2012-07-31 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
At its meeting on July 25, 2012, the XMPP Council agreed to issue a Call for Experience regarding XEP-0071 (XHTML-IM), in preparation for perhaps advancing this specification from Draft to Final in the XSF's standards process. To help the Council decide whether this XEP is ready to advance to a

Re: [Standards] Call for Experience: Advancement of XEP-0071 (XHTML-IM) to Final

2012-07-31 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 7/31/12 2:58 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: If you have any comments about advancing XEP-0071 from Draft to Final, please provide them by the close of business on Friday, August 31, 2012. Section 12.4 of XEP-0071 (version 1.4) reads in full: ### 12.4 W3C Review The XHTML 1.0 Integration

Re: [Standards] Call for Experience: Advancement of XEP-0071 (XHTML-IM) to Final

2012-07-31 Thread Mathieu Pasquet
Is the text of XEP-0071 clear and unambiguous? Are more examples needed? Is the conformance language (MAY/SHOULD/MUST) appropriate? Have developers found the text confusing at all? Please describe any suggestions you have for improving the text. 7.6 states that the style attribute MUST be