Re: [Standards] XEP-0012 And Absolute Time

2013-01-23 Thread Philipp Hancke
Am 24.01.2013 00:00, schrieb Tobias Markmann: I think the value of 'stamp' would be according to XEP-0082, which allows for optional time zone specifier at the end (just 'Z' at the end meaning UTC). http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2007-January/013557.html ? :-)

Re: [Standards] XEP-0012 And Absolute Time

2013-01-23 Thread Tobias Markmann
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Matt Miller wrote: > To be clear, 'stamp' is the equivalent of 'seconds', in absolute terms. > The recipient wouldn't deduct 'seconds' from 'stamp' to get the ultimate > result. > Yes...if both present then on the system initially sending the stanza, stamp = now

Re: [Standards] XEP-0012 And Absolute Time

2013-01-23 Thread Matt Miller
On Jan 23, 2013, at 3:42 PM, Tobias Markmann wrote: > Hi, > > kind of as follow up post to my recent lone message here a more general > approach to the problem. > > How about adding an optional attribute to XEP-0012's query stanza (eg. > stamp) for indicating absolute time. Depending on what y

[Standards] XEP-0012 And Absolute Time

2013-01-23 Thread Tobias Markmann
Hi, kind of as follow up post to my recent lone message here a more general approach to the problem. How about adding an optional attribute to XEP-0012's query stanza (eg. stamp) for indicating absolute time. Depending on what you use the time for you might require the entities in XMPP to be sync