On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Nathan Walp wrote:
> Somewhat related:
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2012-October/026887.html
Not entirely sure why I missed that before. I hadn't thought about the
initial presence versus idle. I guess we do need a new element for it,
then.
/K
On Jan 24, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 1/24/13 9:20 AM, Tobias Markmann wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Matt Miller
>> mailto:linuxw...@outer-planes.net>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Sure, but there are potential priva
On 01/23/2013 05:42 PM, Tobias Markmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> kind of as follow up post to my recent lone message here a more
> general approach to the problem.
>
> How about adding an optional attribute to XEP-0012's query stanza (eg.
> stamp) for indicating absolute time. Depending on what you use the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/24/13 9:20 AM, Tobias Markmann wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Matt Miller
> mailto:linuxw...@outer-planes.net>>
> wrote:
>
> Sure, but there are potential privacy concerns here. Sending UTC
> always does not give away my (extremel
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Matt Miller wrote:
> Sure, but there are potential privacy concerns here. Sending UTC always
> does not give away my (extremely broad) geographical location, while
> including the timezone offset does.
>
> I am not suggesting we force this 'stamp' to always be UTC
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Matt Miller wrote:
> Sure, but there are potential privacy concerns here. Sending UTC always
> does not give away my (extremely broad) geographical location, while
> including the timezone offset does.
>
> I am not suggesting we force this 'stamp' to always be UTC
On Jan 23, 2013, at 4:00 PM, Tobias Markmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Matt Miller
> wrote:
>
>> To be clear, 'stamp' is the equivalent of 'seconds', in absolute terms.
>> The recipient wouldn't deduct 'seconds' from 'stamp' to get the ultimate
>> result.
>>
>
> Yes...if bot
On Jan 24, 2013 6:41 AM, "Philipp Hancke" wrote:
>
> Am 24.01.2013 00:00, schrieb Tobias Markmann:
>
>> I think the value of 'stamp' would be according to XEP-0082, which allows
>> for optional time zone specifier at the end (just 'Z' at the end meaning
>> UTC).
>
>
> http://mail.jabber.org/piperm
