Hi,
within Section 3.5[1] XMPP over Websocket states that the closing party MUST
close the XMPP stream if it has been established. With hindsight of page
transitions within legacy web apps this might not be wanted by the client as it
might wish to resume the stream by use (abuse?) of XEP-0198
Hi,
And now we are talking about XEP-0198, I think the security
considerations should take some more situations in account for the
session hijacking protection. When properly and securely authenticated,
the authentication is enough protection against sesion hijacking. But
when using
Hi,
Reading XEP-0198, I was wondering two things:
- Is there a reason acking and resuming, imho two different and
independent things, are in one XEP?
- Is there also a XEP that takes care of resending a stanza when it does
not get acked?
Winfried
On 01/25/2013 03:16 PM, Stefan Strigler wrote:
Hi,
In order to resend unacknowledged stanzas upon resuming a stream you need to
know about request and anwers.
Clear answer, it made me realise I was thinking about a different case:
what to do when only one or two stanzas are dropped but then
On Jan 25, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Winfried Tilanus winfr...@tilanus.com wrote:
Hi,
And now we are talking about XEP-0198, I think the security
considerations should take some more situations in account for the
session hijacking protection. When properly and securely authenticated,
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/25/13 9:42 AM, Winfried Tilanus wrote:
On 01/25/2013 05:15 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Peter,
[1]
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket-01#section-3.5
IMHO
that spec needs quite a bit of work, still. New
On Friday, January 25, 2013 10:31:32 PM Dave Cridland wrote:
b) A generalized mechanism for constructing node names programmatically to
find such information? Say urn:xmpp:disco:search?owner=d...@jabber.org for
example.
XEP-303 suggests something exactly like this: 'A dynamic node accepts
I too have been working with several extensions lately that need search
capabilities, so this has been in my mind the last few days.
I don't have fully formed ideas on how how it would look, etc, but I would be
interested in experimenting with expanding (or drafting a replacement) XEP-0055
to
