Re: [Standards] [IOT] (no subject)

2013-03-18 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
A small suggestion: Could you please fill the subject of mails in the future? Thanks, Andreas

Re: [Standards] Questions about sensor XEPs

2013-03-18 Thread Peter Waher
Hello Teemu Thank you for your mail. Regarding your questions: If I understand correctly, there are totally 11 XEPs for sensor devices coming out, do you know when the other 10 will be published? We have published 2 (Sensor data and EXI over XMPP), and hopefully one more will be published

Re: [Standards] EXI extension proposal

2013-03-18 Thread Peter Waher
Dear Yusuke, Regarding your questions: Is a mail with the subject 'Requirement Clarification' sent to the list? I've not received one. Stepping back to the requirements. For example, what I need is binary-only bootstrap mechanism for EXI (not like XEP-0138) with least negotiation/propose

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

2013-03-18 Thread Kim Alvefur
On 2013-02-21 01:43, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to clarify an existing protocol? Yes. 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction and requirements? Yes. 3. Do you plan to implement