Para suscribirse o darse de baja a través de la World Wide Web, visite
http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
o bien, por correo electrónico, envíe un mensaje con asunto o cuerpo 'help'
para standards-requ...@xmpp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mail
So XEP-0156 details how to use DNS records to advertise alternative ways to
connect to an XMPP server, namely BOSH and soon WebSocket. That's great, except
that in the browser you can't make arbitrary DNS requests, which severely
limits the usefulness of this method.
Any interest in standardizi
Inspired by the berlin initiative by Stpeter, I would like to invite
anyone interested for a beer and some refreshing Internet of Things
discussion to San Francisco.
I'm visiting as part of a Swedish delegation on research cooperation
around smart grid technologies.
http://www.meetup.com/technolo
I'm unfortunately on vacation but it is a very good inititive!
2013/5/17 Alexander Gnauck :
>
>> Anyone interested?
>
>
> absolutely!!!
>
> Alex
--
Regards
Joachim Lindborg
CTO, systems architect
Sustainable Innovation AB
Adress: Box 55998 102 16 Stockholm
Besöksadress: Storgatan 31 (Malmgår
Quiero darme de baja de la lista de XMPP.
> It doesn't really normatively reference XEP-0246. I'd propose the following
> wording change:
>
> OLD
> Once discovery has been completed, the clients are able to negotiate an XML
> stream between themselves (as generalized in End-to-End XML Streams [2]) and
> then exchange messages and other
Me too!! :)
Am 17.05.2013 um 22:00 schrieb Alexander Gnauck :
>
>> Anyone interested?
>
> absolutely!!!
>
> Alex
> Anyone interested?
>
absolutely!!!
Alex
One of the features from XEP-0136 that I would like to see included in
XEP-0313 is message removal.
It could follow the same logic as message retrieval, just instead of
"query" it would be "remove" and be of type "set":
jul...@capulet.com
2010-06-07T00:00:00Z
2010-07-07T13:23:54Z
Would it b
Hi,
On 17 May 2013 20:24, Spencer MacDonald
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think in example 5 http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0059.html#limit, the
> Result Set should use max and not limit.
Yes, you are right. I have this fixed in my local copy that I was
working on late last year. I never actually finished
Hi,
I think in example 5 http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0059.html#limit, the
Result Set should use max and not limit.
*Example 5. A query using Result Set Management*
2010-08-07T00:00:00Z
10
XEP 0059 Results Set Management doesn't specify the limit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/17/13 10:11 AM, Peter Waher wrote:
> Hello
>
>
>
> A small question for the XMPP Standards Community regarding
> server-less communication:
>
>
>
> XEP-0174 (http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0174.html Serverless
> messaging, Final) defines an
Hello Sergey
There are many aims in fact.
But one aim is to be able to move existing applications (web applications, web
services, semantic applications, etc. hosted on the web) and move them into new
settings (for instance hosting it at home) and be able to reuse them without
having to change
13 matches
Mail list logo
