On 2013-07-10 22:27, Dave Cridland wrote:
> So, to be able to create such a seamless transition (which is also
important in semantic web scenarios) we need an URI scheme that works in
a syntactically identical manner as the already existing http URI
scheme. Now, there exists another such URI sch
On 10 Jul 2013 10:37, "Peter Waher" wrote:
> Regarding why the existing xmpp scheme cannot be used, and maintain
compatibility, especially as you suggested a new query type needs to be
defined, is because of the desire to be able to create seamless transitions
of existing web applications from HTT
Hello Ralph
Thanks for your comments.
> I agree with Peter (Saint-Andre). Just introducing a new scheme doesn't feel
> right to me. At the very least I'd like to see a rational for not using the
> xmpp scheme, which should be able to handle the use cases, that goes beyond
> the lack of charact
Hello Peter
Thanks for your comments. I'll respond to each in turn:
>> Hello Ralph
>>
>> Thanks for your mail. You're absolutely correct. It was sloppy of me
>> to propose a URI scheme with the same name as the previous xmpp
>> scheme. I'm sorry.
>>
>> I've therefore renamed the scheme to ht
