Re: [Standards] XEP-280 and MUC private chats

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 05:36:51PM +0100, Kevin Smith wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Mathieu Pasquet wrote: > > I was starting to implement carbons in poezio when I came across some > > kind of design issue that I haven’t been able to work out. > > > > As I understand it (and in the use

Re: [Standards] XEP-280 and MUC private chats

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Mathieu Pasquet wrote: > I was starting to implement carbons in poezio when I came across some > kind of design issue that I haven’t been able to work out. > > As I understand it (and in the use case explained in the introduction), > Carbons provide a way to minimiz

Re: [Standards] 191

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 7/8/13 4:23 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: >> >> On 8 Jul 2013 04:32, "Kevin Smith" > > wrote: >>> >>> In 191, if A as blocked B, B's presences to A should be dropped. Any >>> directed presence from A to B should