I'm coming along to the Summit in sunny[1] Portland, and I was thinking about
what I might like to discuss, both with the others coming, and also online
with the broader community.
I don't think there's any specific issues I'm poring over with XMPP currently.
There's no contentious issues in
On 25 September 2013 12:09, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
I don't think there's any specific issues I'm poring over with XMPP
currently. There's no contentious issues in XEPs, or IETF I-Ds, that I'm
feeling particularly anxious about.
Jingle? :)
Besides, the most productive Summit
Hello,
On 2013-06-09 20:40, Mathieu Pasquet wrote:
I was starting to implement carbons in poezio when I came across some
kind of design issue that I haven’t been able to work out.
However, in the case of private MUC messages (XEP-0045, 7.5), the
messages are also of type 'chat', causing
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Kim Alvefur z...@zash.se wrote:
Hello,
On 2013-06-09 20:40, Mathieu Pasquet wrote:
I was starting to implement carbons in poezio when I came across some
kind of design issue that I haven’t been able to work out.
However, in the case of private MUC messages
Version 0.5 of XEP-0152 (Reachability Addresses) has been released.
Abstract: This document defines an XMPP protocol extension for communicating
information about how an entity can be reached temporarily using methods other
than the entity's normal JID.
Changelog: Modified the text and
