Hello Ralph
Thanks for your input. I'll answer your comments one at a time:
>> Tables are explicitly forbidden in the current version for the
>> following reasons [..]
>
>Forbidden seems a particularly strong interpretation. To be clear, the
>specification says:
>> Any other elements and attri
On 2013-11-05 13:53, Peter Waher wrote:
> [..]
>> I would however *not* explicitly require support for tables, as that
> would imply no IM client could be considered properly compatible with
> the XEP-0071 without support for rendering HTML tables.
>
> What could be required is to support the mar
Hello Ivan.
Thanks for your response and all your suggestions. Some comments on what you
wrote:
> I am all for permitting table support long term, but not requiring (or even
> encouraging it).
That’s the idea. Permitting it. And also recommend clients showing XHTML to
either support a basic s
On 2013-11-04 21:55, Peter Waher wrote:
> Hello all
>
>
>
> I have some suggested additions to the XHTML-IM extension XEP-0071
> (which is still in Draft). [..]
>
> Tables are explicitly forbidden in the current version for the following
> reasons [..]
Forbidden seems a particularly strong in
