On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Waqas Hussain wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Peter Waher wrote:
>> Hello Philipp
>>
>> Thanks for your input. I've updated the according to your comments, and
>> attach a new version.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Peter Waher
>>
>
> Hey Peter,
>
> Something whi
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Peter Waher wrote:
> Hello Philipp
>
> Thanks for your input. I've updated the according to your comments, and
> attach a new version.
>
> Best regards,
> Peter Waher
>
Hey Peter,
Something which I don't think has been discussed: Encoding. I'm
assuming syslog-to-
Hello Lance
Thanks for your input. I'll respond to your concerns one at a time:
Minor things I noticed:
- The timestamp attribute. We've been using 'stamp' as the name for that type
of attribute.
Time stamp is otherwise a known and well-defined term. Stamp makes me think of
snail mail
I noticed:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-problem-05
this morning, and I wondered about its applicability to BOSH for fatal
errors at the XEP-0124 level.
I don't think XEP-0124 really goes into much detail about error responses -
I confess to not having looked at the new versio
