[Standards] Disco presence subscription confusion

Hi, In XEP-0030 (Service Discovery - http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0030.html#security), it says the server MUST return a service-unavailable/ error if: The requesting entity is not authorized to receive presence from the target entity (i.e., via a presence subscription of type both or

Re: [Standards] Disco presence subscription confusion

On Jun 11, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Graham King gra...@gkgk.org wrote: Is this a correct reading? From the code I think this is how Prosody interprets it, and it makes intuitive sense (to me at least!). If this reading is correct, could I submit a patch to the XEP to clarify? Sounds right. Send

Re: [Standards] Disco presence subscription confusion

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 14-06-11 11:29 AM, Lance Stout wrote: On Jun 11, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Graham King gra...@gkgk.org wrote: Is this a correct reading? From the code I think this is how Prosody interprets it, and it makes intuitive sense (to me at least!). If

[Standards] UPnP and XMPP

I haven’t heard anything from the XMPP/UPnP Liaisons, but I just stumbled over this on the UPnP homepage (http://upnp.org/news/2014/): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-QpNnQrT2Ulist=UUY7zsGPIO9PRbUDv1obTBWQ Personally I am hoping for some progress for Multi-Screen and XMPP which I have been