On 15 July 2014 23:59, Graham King gra...@gkgk.org wrote:
I have recently been working with XEP-0186, and I wanted to add notes
from my experience. I think some minor clarifications around when
invisibility stops could be added.
These comments are great, thanks.
In 2. Requirements / point
On 6/19/14, 9:30 PM, Lance Stout wrote:
1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to
clarify an existing protocol?
This is a feature that has received a lot of end-user requests, and we have no
other good way to do it, so yes.
If anyone is going to ever
On 7/6/14, 11:56 AM, Christian Schudt wrote:
I might be too late to the party,
Definitely not!
but I just began implementing it on
client side and I think 3.1.2 Client Handling lacks some point:
After becoming invisible the client should (automatically?) send
directed presence (which equals
Silly question:
Why not just have invisible as a presence mode, and remove the silly
enforced empty presence/ at initialization?
/stefan
Peter Saint-Andre skrev 16/07/14 17:11:
On 6/19/14, 9:30 PM, Lance Stout wrote:
1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol
stack
Actually with the current iq scheme, that's one thing that should be
clarified:
Can the invisible iq be sent before initial presence?
It seems that would need to be supported in order to not leak your presence
when you first log on, otherwise a contact may see you come online
momentarily and
On 14-07-16 12:39 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On 15 July 2014 23:59, Graham King gra...@gkgk.org
In 2. Requirements / point 2, it says Invisible mode is active only
for the current session. Could it say .. only for the current
*presence* session (as defined in RFC 6121 section 4.1)? I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
XEP-0045 (Multi-User Chat) doesn't say that it should be implemented
as a Component (XEP-0114). I think it should mention that.
I remember getting quite confused when I first worked on implementing
MUCs because I was new to XMPP. All the
On 16 July 2014 19:33, Graham King gra...@gkgk.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
XEP-0045 (Multi-User Chat) doesn't say that it should be implemented
as a Component (XEP-0114). I think it should mention that.
I don't think there's such a requirement.
