Dave, maybe could you (or somebody else) elaborate on the shortcomings and
the different demands of things like buddycloud you have discussed for those
who didn't attend the summit.
Also what's so bad about multiple parties chatting via a third party chat
service (your 2nd use case)?
For me
At the summit, a bunch of us decided to have a serious effort at a redesign
of multi user chat, to address shortcomings and emerging use cases.
The overall model was a service domain which exposed, at bare jid level, a
set of rooms, which acted more or less as pubsub services, with subsidiary
On 12 Feb 2015 14:00, Christian Schudt christian.sch...@gmx.de wrote:
Dave, maybe could you (or somebody else) elaborate on the shortcomings
and the different demands of things like buddycloud you have discussed
for those who didn't attend the summit.
Also what's so bad about multiple parties
* Christian Schudt christian.sch...@gmx.de [2015-02-12 14:59]:
For me one shortcoming of XEP-0045 is that there's no good concept for
the offline case of an occupant (member).
That could be solved with MAM (XEP-0313), for what it's worth.
Holger
