I would like us to Get This Right, though. People have been mumbling about
replacing MUC for years, and I’ve always been resistant;
the discussions at the summit this year persuaded me that we finally have
requirements that MUC1 can’t easily meet, but I really do
not want us to do MUC2
On 26 Jun 2015, at 00:51, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote:
Lance Stout and I had a conversation the other day about what we call guest
access to an XMPP application. As example, consider a chat service (text,
video, what have you) that has registered users and the ability for
On 6/26/15 5:26 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 26 June 2015 at 00:51, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote:
Lance Stout and I had a conversation the other day about what we call guest
access to an XMPP application. As example, consider a chat service (text,
video, what have you) that has
On 6/26/15 5:57 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On 26 June 2015 at 00:51, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net
mailto:pe...@andyet.net wrote:
Lance Stout and I had a conversation the other day about what we
call guest access to an XMPP application. As example, consider a
chat service
fre jun 26 16:45:56 2015 GMT+0200 skrev Peter Saint-Andre - yet:
Sure, you need to do the SRV two-step.
I'm not sure I understand completely, then. Are you proposing that the
target of the SRV record is the XMPP host (and thus ignore the port?)?
I'm not sure I understand completely
On 26 June 2015 at 13:40, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote:
On 6/26/15 5:57 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On 26 June 2015 at 00:51, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net
mailto:pe...@andyet.net wrote:
Lance Stout and I had a conversation the other day about what we
On 6/26/15 6:46 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 26 June 2015 at 13:38, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote:
On 6/26/15 5:26 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 26 June 2015 at 00:51, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net
wrote:
Thus we need a way for a client to discover where it can
On 26 June 2015 at 15:45, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote:
On 6/26/15 6:46 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 26 June 2015 at 13:38, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net
wrote:
On 6/26/15 5:26 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
I'm not sure I understand completely, then. Are you proposing
On 26 Jun 2015 07:24, Steve Kille steve.ki...@isode.com wrote:
I would like us to Get This Right, though. People have been mumbling
about replacing MUC for years, and I’ve always been resistant;
the discussions at the summit this year persuaded me that we finally
have requirements that MUC1
On 26 June 2015 at 00:51, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote:
Lance Stout and I had a conversation the other day about what we call guest
access to an XMPP application. As example, consider a chat service (text,
video, what have you) that has registered users and the ability for
On 26 June 2015 at 00:51, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote:
Lance Stout and I had a conversation the other day about what we call
guest access to an XMPP application. As example, consider a chat service
(text, video, what have you) that has registered users and the ability for
On 26 June 2015 at 13:38, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote:
On 6/26/15 5:26 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 26 June 2015 at 00:51, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net
wrote:
Thus we need a way for a client to discover where it can authenticate as
an
ad-hoc or guest user. We
12 matches
Mail list logo
