Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0280 (Message Carbons)

2016-06-22 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 6/22/16 10:06 AM, Georg Lukas wrote: * Peter Saint-Andre [2016-06-22 17:44]: A is not eligible for carbons delivery if it is determined to have been sent by a MUC room or service, even if it would be otherwise eligible (this also includes private messages from MUC participants).

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0280 (Message Carbons)

2016-06-22 Thread Georg Lukas
* Peter Saint-Andre [2016-06-22 17:44]: >A is not eligible for carbons delivery if it is >determined to have been sent by a MUC room or service, even if it >would be otherwise eligible (this also includes private messages >from MUC participants). IMHO, this rule is more relevant

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0280 (Message Carbons)

2016-06-22 Thread Tobias Markmann
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > 2. Given the widespread deployment of messaging services that are centered > on groupchat (e.g., Slack and HipChat), it seems shortsighted to specify > this rule: > >A is not eligible for carbons delivery if it is >determined to

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0280 (Message Carbons)

2016-06-22 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 6/14/16 7:26 AM, Kim Alvefur wrote: On 2015-08-13 22:18, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0280 (Message Carbons). Friendly inquiry regarding the status of this LC. The Council is voting. In fact, all of the other Council mem