Re: [Standards] XEP-0359 Client vs. non-client IDs

2016-10-03 Thread Guus der Kinderen
I appreciate the implementation-related argument too. I don't think that that argument should outweigh the value of applying clear, concise naming. Removing the "client/server" role is a big improvement there. There's no use-case for this XEP where the 'by' is left out by an entity that's not an 'o

Re: [Standards] XEP-0359 Client vs. non-client IDs

2016-10-03 Thread Kevin Smith
> On 2 Oct 2016, at 18:46, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > On 29.09.2016 20:18, Kevin Smith wrote: >> On 29 Sep 2016, at 19:08, Florian Schmaus wrote: >>> >>> On 29.09.2016 19:22, Guus der Kinderen wrote: Hi, What's the purpose of the distinction between "Unique Stanza IDs" and

Re: [Standards] XEP-0308: Last Message Correction and Carbons

2016-10-03 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 03.10.2016 10:08, Kevin Smith wrote: > On 2 Oct 2016, at 18:47, Florian Schmaus wrote: >> >> On 30.09.2016 18:12, Kevin Smith wrote: >>> On 30 Sep 2016, at 10:01, Dave Cridland wrote: On 30 September 2016 at 09:49, Kevin Smith wrote: > >> On 29 Sep 2016, at 22:58, Dave Cridl

Re: [Standards] XEP-0308: Last Message Correction and Carbons

2016-10-03 Thread Kevin Smith
On 2 Oct 2016, at 18:47, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > On 30.09.2016 18:12, Kevin Smith wrote: >> On 30 Sep 2016, at 10:01, Dave Cridland wrote: >>> >>> On 30 September 2016 at 09:49, Kevin Smith wrote: > On 29 Sep 2016, at 22:58, Dave Cridland wrote: > > > On 29 Sep 2016