[Standards] 2017-01-25 Council Meeting Minutes

2017-01-26 Thread Tobias Markmann
# 2017-01-25 Council Meeting Minutes ## Roll Call ( http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2017-01-25/#16:00:20 ) - Tobias (chairing) - Daniel - Dave - Link Mauve - Sam ## Minute Taker ( http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2017-01-25/#16:03:28 ) Tobias takes minutes; Daniel offered to take minutes next time. #

Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0334 (Message Processing Hints)

2017-01-26 Thread Georg Lukas
* Georg Lukas [2017-01-26 12:56]: > It also needs to be added into 0280 to reflect current practice. PR: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/382 Because the XSF can't decide whether 'no-copy' is better or worse than 'private', I've added both to the client side. I hope we don't need a version bump

Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0334 (Message Processing Hints)

2017-01-26 Thread Sam Whited
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Georg Lukas wrote: > Can we get this advanced, please? It is used by 0313, 0364, 0384 and > 0384. Added to the council's agenda: https://trello.com/c/FEf0BApY ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mail

Re: [Standards] 2017-01-18 Council Meeting

2017-01-26 Thread Valerian Saliou
Hi, On the chat marker XEP, as far as I remember, it looked consistent to me when I implemented support for it in Jappix. So, from an application developer perspective, the spec. is a good fit for what it says it does and I had no trouble w/ it, nor requirements not fulfilled. Cheers, -- Vale

Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0334 (Message Processing Hints)

2017-01-26 Thread Georg Lukas
* XMPP Extensions Editor [2017-01-18 03:17]: > XEP-0334 (Message Processing Hints) has been Deferred because of inactivity. Can we get this advanced, please? It is used by 0313, 0364, 0384 and 0384. It also needs to be added into 0280 to reflect current practice. Georg -- || http://op-co.de +

Re: [Standards] 2017 Compliance Suites

2017-01-26 Thread Georg Lukas
* Sam Whited [2017-01-18 17:44]: > We discussed moving forward the 2016 compliance suites today [..] I'm curious why we don't just rename XEP-0375 from 2016 to 2017? That would reduce the number of deprecated XEPs and implementer confusion. > - Remove MIX as an optional spec to satisfy the multi