On 24.02.2017 13:10, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Maybe initial presence should also be wrapped up inside bind2?
This could be handy. On the other hand how should this interoperate
with RFC 6121 4.2.1. In this section it's "recommended" that the
client first get's roster from the server and
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:50:03PM +, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
> XEP-0233 (XMPP Server Registration for use with Kerberos V5).
>
> Abstract: This specification defines the Kerberos principal name of an
> XMPP server. It also
Hi,
Please find my comments below.
> On 8 Feb 2017, at 22:50, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
>
> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0233 (XMPP
> Server Registration for use with Kerberos V5).
>
> Abstract: This specification defines the Kerberos principal name o
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for your comments.
On 24 February 2017 at 10:25, Kevin Smith wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 24 Feb 2017, at 08:31, Michal Piotrowski solutions.com> wrote:
> > XEP-0386: Bind 2.0 spec says:
> >
> > > Clear the offline messages for this user, if any, without sending them
> (as they
Hi Michal,
On 24 Feb 2017, at 08:31, Michal Piotrowski
wrote:
> XEP-0386: Bind 2.0 spec says:
>
> > Clear the offline messages for this user, if any, without sending them (as
> > they will be provided by MAM).
>
> XEP-0160: Best Practices for Handling Offline Messages says:
>
> > When the re
Hi,
inline you'll find my vote.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> Link to log: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2017-02-22/#16:01:02
>
> 1) Roll call
> - Daniel
> - Sam
> - Link Mauve
> - Dave
> - Tobias (chairing)
>
> 2) minute taker
> - Daniel volunteers
>
> 3) outsta
Hi,
I've just run into this dilemma.
XEP-0386: Bind 2.0 spec says:
> Clear the offline messages for this user, if any, without sending them
(as they will be provided by MAM).
XEP-0160: Best Practices for Handling Offline Messages says:
> When the recipient next sends non-negative available pre