Re: [Standards] 2017-11-08 XSF Council Minutes

2017-11-20 Thread Kozlov Konstantin
Styling. Looks like I've got something mixed up.20.11.2017, 21:28, "Evgeny Khramtsov" :Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:34:52 +0500Konstantin Kozlov wrote: It's too bad you didn't use your veto against that awful proto.Which proto do you mean?___Sta

Re: [Standards] 2017-11-08 XSF Council Minutes

2017-11-20 Thread Kozlov Konstantin
I was talking about "Styling" only. "Markup" is an interesting thing, but I think it's too weak right now. At least image embedding needs to be added to make it possible to replace XEP-0071 with it.20.11.2017, 19:58, "Dave Cridland" :On 20 November 2017 at 16:34, Konstantin Kozlov

Re: [Standards] 2017-11-08 XSF Council Minutes

2017-11-20 Thread Evgeny Khramtsov
Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:34:52 +0500 Konstantin Kozlov wrote: > It's too bad you didn't use your veto against that awful proto. Which proto do you mean? ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standar

Re: [Standards] 2017-11-08 XSF Council Minutes

2017-11-20 Thread Dave Cridland
On 20 November 2017 at 16:34, Konstantin Kozlov wrote: > It's too bad you didn't use your veto against that awful proto. > It don't even worth to waste XEP number for things like this one. Wait - which one did you want us to veto? Both? Neither? ___ Sta

Re: [Standards] 2017-11-08 XSF Council Minutes

2017-11-20 Thread Konstantin Kozlov
It's too bad you didn't use your veto against that awful proto.It don't even worth to waste XEP number for things like this one.___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org

Re: [Standards] 2017-11-08 XSF Council Minutes

2017-11-20 Thread Sam Whited
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017, at 10:49, JC Brand wrote: > 2. Vote on accepting the "Markup" ProtoXEP > > * Link Mauve: +1 > * daniel: +1 > * dwd: +1 > > Tobias and SamWhited will vote via the mailing list. -0 The more I think about this protoxep the more I think it's not a direction we want to go. If th

Re: [Standards] XEP-0392: Consistent Color Generation - Issues using JID

2017-11-20 Thread Jonas Wielicki
On Montag, 20. November 2017 09:09:48 CET Maxime Buquet wrote: > Hi there, > > A few remarks regarding 0392 after having it implemented in poezio, > thanks to Jonas. > > Using JIDs as the source for the hash brings at least an issue to me in > MUCs. You'll see the same person in different colors

[Standards] XEP-0392: Consistent Color Generation - Issues using JID

2017-11-20 Thread Maxime Buquet
Hi there, A few remarks regarding 0392 after having it implemented in poezio, thanks to Jonas. Using JIDs as the source for the hash brings at least an issue to me in MUCs. You'll see the same person in different colors depending on what room you're looking at. Another point I feel about but I d