On 22 January 2018 at 14:13, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:42:59 +
> Dave Cridland wrote:
>
>> I don't think RTTs should block UI either, but startup RTTs mean we
>> cannot send or receive messages for several RTTs, and that's a very
>> real problem over slower networks.
>
> W
I think I should give you a real example where ISR really matters:
Under iOS you can not run your app in the background and keep it permanently
connected. And push doesn't always wake up your app in the background (there
are *some* circumstances which allow this but much more exceptions).
So: I
Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:42:59 +
Dave Cridland wrote:
> I don't think RTTs should block UI either, but startup RTTs mean we
> cannot send or receive messages for several RTTs, and that's a very
> real problem over slower networks.
What problem? If you're on slow network, expect everything to be
s
On 22 January 2018 at 13:26, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:16:40 -
> Jonas Wielicki (XSF Editor) wrote:
>
>> Version 0.1.0 of XEP-0397 (Instant Stream Resumption) has been
>> released.
>
> Previous discussion has faded away, so I will be ranting here again: I
> don't see exces
Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:16:40 -
Jonas Wielicki (XSF Editor) wrote:
> Version 0.1.0 of XEP-0397 (Instant Stream Resumption) has been
> released.
Previous discussion has faded away, so I will be ranting here again: I
don't see excessive RTT as a problem. I'm not convinced that excessive
RTTs block
On 22 January 2018 at 11:16, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0397.html
So now this is published, I think I can list my (current) blockers for
advancing it, as well as more general improvements that I think ought
to be made, and suggestions for unblocking.
The essenti
Version 0.1.0 of XEP-0397 (Instant Stream Resumption) has been
released.
Abstract:
This specification introduces a mechanism for instant stream
resumption, based on Stream Management (XEP-0198), allowing XMPP
entities to instantaneously resume an XMPP stream.
Changelog:
Accepted by council vote f
On 22.01.2018 09:57, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On 19 January 2018 at 18:00, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>> On 30.11.2017 21:10, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>>> I also like to ask Council to consider this ProtoXEP for acceptance.
>> It's been 7 weeks. What is the status of this?
>
> According yo the XMPP Counc
Folks,
For my personal benefit, I'm tracking voting on a Google spreadsheet here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AZ-Sna6OiRG--b-mJMKv3XXfrn3Nehm0kAtlyJvImL0/edit#gid=0
This is a public spreadsheet so you don't need a Google account to read it.
I don't claim any accuracy, but I'll be na
On 19 January 2018 at 18:00, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> On 30.11.2017 21:10, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>> I also like to ask Council to consider this ProtoXEP for acceptance.
>
> It's been 7 weeks. What the status of this?
According yo the XMPP Council Spreadsheet Of Unofficial Doom, that was
voted on
On Freitag, 19. Januar 2018 11:31:49 CET Sam Whited wrote:
> If that sounds like you, please reach out and I'd be happy to help you get
> started picking back up where I left off.
I’ll be happy to take over the '18 suites for the sake of getting them
published this week.
I don’t know what the co
11 matches
Mail list logo
