Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0335 (JSON Containers)

On 9/15/20 1:41 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 10:08, Florian Schmaus > wrote: > > On 9/14/20 9:28 PM, Sam Whited wrote: > > What escaping mechanism, the JSON one or the XML one (probably the > JSON > > one to avoid weird

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0335 (JSON Containers)

On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 10:08, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 9/14/20 9:28 PM, Sam Whited wrote: > > What escaping mechanism, the JSON one or the XML one (probably the JSON > > one to avoid weird double-escaping issues)? > > I wonder if this does matter. > > The tricky part are code points that do

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0335 (JSON Containers)

On 9/14/20 9:28 PM, Sam Whited wrote: > What escaping mechanism, the JSON one or the XML one (probably the JSON > one to avoid weird double-escaping issues)? I wonder if this does matter. The tricky part are code points that do not need to be escaped in JSON, but are invalid and not escapeable

Re: [Standards] On Stanza/Element signing

Hello Paul https://gitlab.com/IEEE-SA/XMPPI/IoT/-/blob/master/E2E.md As you are asking about E2EE methods, I´d like to add a reference to a proposal we’ve developed within IEEE, suitable both for things and more powerful endpoints. Best regards, Peter Waher Hi List, I see there have been