Am Mittwoch, dem 11.08.2021 um 14:25 -0600 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
> Too bad we didn't stick to our guns in 2003 and insist on two ports
> instead of one, but STARTTLS was the recommended approach back
> then...
>
I am still not convinced the STARTTLS is ultimate evil. SMTP had way
too many bug
Le 2021-08-11 17:35, Jonas Schäfer a écrit :
Hi goffi,
Thanks for proposing this. The council has today vetoed the advancement
for
this ProtoXEP to Experimental, but I'd like to give you some feedback
because
I think the problem you're trying to address is real. The bottom of
this email
cont
We've had this discussion before but for context in this thread: I
ignore that as it doesn't make any sense (and follow the second thing
and just decide myself how I want to connect). I know at least one or
two others do to, but I don't know which strategy is more wide spread.
—Sam
On Thu, Aug 12
* Sam Whited [2021-08-11 17:21]:
> In my experience it's widely supported these days.
At least for c2s, yes.
> I also don't know if clients prioritize these records over starttls.
XEP-0368 says:
| Both 'xmpp-' and 'xmpps-' records SHOULD be treated as the same record
| with regard to connectio
Quoting Kim Alvefur :
We were always at war with STARTTLS?
The world is at war with both ports < 443 and ports > 443.
___
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
