[Standards] Re: NEW: XEP-0481 (Content Types in Messages)

2023-06-06 Thread Dave Cridland
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 22:34, Travis Burtrum wrote: > > Jun 6, 2023 4:31:54 PM Dave Cridland : > > > > > On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 15:06, wrote: > >> Version 0.1.0 of XEP-0481 (Content Types in Messages) has been > >> released. > > > > This is weirdly horrible. > > Me too, but it's not council's job

[Standards] Re: NEW: XEP-0481 (Content Types in Messages)

2023-06-06 Thread Travis Burtrum
Jun 6, 2023 4:31:54 PM Dave Cridland : > > On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 15:06, wrote: >> Version 0.1.0 of XEP-0481 (Content Types in Messages) has been >> released. > > This is weirdly horrible. Me too, but it's not council's job to police the protocol, what gets widely used is decided by running

[Standards] Re: NEW: XEP-0481 (Content Types in Messages)

2023-06-06 Thread Dave Cridland
On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 15:06, wrote: > Version 0.1.0 of XEP-0481 (Content Types in Messages) has been > released. > This is weirdly horrible. * First and foremost, it falls into a general trap that's open to abuse by malicious actors, by having a message whose content will be interpreted

[Standards] Re: Wrapping up the XMPP Lemmy Experiment

2023-06-06 Thread Kevin Smith
-- Original Message -- From "Matthew Wild" To "XMPP Standards" Date 06/06/2023 13:40:29 Subject [Standards] Re: Wrapping up the XMPP Lemmy Experiment Thanks Sam, for taking the lead on this initiative. Yes, thanks for trying a thing. /K

[Standards] Re: Wrapping up the XMPP Lemmy Experiment

2023-06-06 Thread Sam Whited
I tend to agree; I just posted what I see as the results of the experiment from my perspective on Lemmy, so I'll copy it over here as well: My personal opinion is that the results of the experiment are that Lemmy is not a good platform for community building. I’m glad we gave it a shot, but I

[Standards] Re: Wrapping up the XMPP Lemmy Experiment

2023-06-06 Thread Matthew Wild
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 12:53, Guus der Kinderen wrote: > > I fear that this never lived up to its potential. Unless someone is actively > going to do something with this, I'd not let it linger. That only adds to > fragmentation and overhead. Too bad though. +1. We always considered it an

[Standards] Re: Wrapping up the XMPP Lemmy Experiment

2023-06-06 Thread Guus der Kinderen
I fear that this never lived up to its potential. Unless someone is actively going to do something with this, I'd not let it linger. That only adds to fragmentation and overhead. Too bad though. - Guus On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 1:45 PM Sam Whited wrote: > Hi all, > > It's been over a year and

[Standards] Wrapping up the XMPP Lemmy Experiment

2023-06-06 Thread Sam Whited
Hi all, It's been over a year and the folks hosting the XMPP Lemmy experiment at community.xmpp.net have asked us to start transitioning it to our own hosting. I'm writing to see what the community would like to do, or if anyone wants to take over hosting? The instance was never very widely