Re: [Standards] XEP-323 timestamp

2014-02-20 Thread Joakim Eriksson
mic" to consider clean naming to be a more important thing than number of implementations but that is my perspective. Best regards, -- Joakim Eriksson Best regards, Peter Waher Peter Waher skrev 2014-02-20 18:04: > Hello Joakim. > > Thanks for your input. > &g

Re: [Standards] XEP-323 timestamp

2014-02-20 Thread Joakim Eriksson
presented by an element and a level in the hierarchy. Best regards, Peter Waher -Original Message- From: Joakim Eriksson [mailto:joak...@sics.se] Sent: den 20 februari 2014 13:12 To: Peter Waher; XMPP Standards Cc: joak...@sics.se Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP-323 timestamp Yes, the grou

Re: [Standards] XEP-323 timestamp

2014-02-20 Thread Joakim Eriksson
grouping feature of the timestamp element. Best regards, Peter Waher -Original Message----- From: Joakim Eriksson [mailto:joak...@sics.se] Sent: den 19 januari 2014 17:44 To: XMPP Standards Subject: [Standards] XEP-323 timestamp I think that the XEP-323 timestamp is a bit strange. I would have

Re: [Standards] [IOT] IoT device Discovery XEP

2014-02-20 Thread Joakim Eriksson
I am also interested. But also very interested in cutting down a few of the current IoT XEP:s in order to get them a bit more lightweight and generic. Best regards, -- Joakim Steffen Larsen skrev 2014-02-20 10:27: Hi Peter, I would very munch be interested. /Steffen On 17 Feb 2014, at 23:30

[Standards] XEP-323 timestamp

2014-01-19 Thread Joakim Eriksson
case is looks like the timestamp has a set of attributes that are temperatures, runtime, etc. which feels a bit strange. I think it would make more sense if it would be like this: or (timestamp in the sensordata node) Best regards, -- Joakim Eriksson, SICS

Re: [Standards] PS: XEP-323 vs XEP-325

2014-01-15 Thread Joakim Eriksson
I like and dislike and provide more feedback as soon as I have more to say ;-) Best regards, -- Joakim Eriksson, SICS Peter Waher skrev 2014-01-15 18:17: PS: Forgot to mention relating to the discussion regarding unit conversion in devices: One important factor in the design of the I

Re: [Standards] XEP-323 vs XEP-325

2014-01-15 Thread Joakim Eriksson
-- Joakim Eriksson, SICS Peter Waher skrev 2014-01-15 16:22: Hello Joakim The control form provides means to publish limits for control values. See ยง3.3.1 for examples. Best regards, Peter Waher -Original Message----- From: Joakim Eriksson [mailto:joak...@sics.se] Sent: den 15 januari 201

Re: [Standards] XEP-323 vs XEP-325

2014-01-15 Thread Joakim Eriksson
Tomasz Sterna skrev 2014-01-15 11:54: Dnia 2014-01-14, wto o godzinie 11:30 +0100, Joakim Eriksson pisze: ... I can understand omitting unit and momentary [...] I can't understand omitting the unit. You need to know up front what unit does the control expect. There's

Re: [Standards] XEP-323 vs XEP-325

2014-01-14 Thread Joakim Eriksson
r is there a need for the controlling entity to know what it is doing by knowing that this is in fact a room temperature and not a oven temperature. Best regards -- Joakim Eriksson, SICS Peter Waher skrev 2014-01-14 15:38: Hello Joakim Thank you for your mail. I'll try to respond to you

[Standards] XEP-323 vs XEP-325

2014-01-14 Thread Joakim Eriksson
ames (e.g. or in both)? Best regards, -- Joakim Eriksson, SICS