Peter,
> > Section 4.2.3
> >
> > XEP-0308 specifies use of "id" in and . Could we
> > not just use "" along with ""? It would require some
> > text in
> > XEP-0308 that says that if is received without , it
> > shall be ignored. In -0301, it would not be ignored. "id" works, but
> > I would
Mark, et al,
I re-read the draft and here are my comments. After I wrote all of this, I
thought it sounds like I'm pounding on everything. Overall, the text was
great.. it has come a long way. That said, here are my comments and
questions:
Section 1:
"and is favored by deaf and hard of hearing
